Proof-texting is the practice of quoting a verse, or verses from the text of the Bible, to support, or refute a doctrine. This practice has been used by the orthodox and the heretic. The dangers of proof-texting are varied and manifold. With proper presuppositions proof-texting can be a valuable tool for supporting orthodox doctrines.
First, we will go over the problems with proof-texting. The biggest problem is when a person or group starts with a false presupposition. For example, a Mormon starts with the presupposition that Jesus is a created being. They hold this false presupposition because they believe the words of a false prophet, and teacher in authority over God’s very own word. The Seventh Day Adventists, Jehovah’s Witnesses, and Muslims, do the same thing.
With this presupposition when they run into texts like John 3:16 “…For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life…” They wrongly understand the word, “begotten” to mean that Jesus was the progeny of the Father. They then, in turn use this as a proof-text for their false doctrine that deny the eternal deity of Jesus, in stark disregard for His proclamation of being the, “I Am.” This, in turn requires more eisegesis, and proof-texting, in an attempt to refute the true doctrines, in conflict with their false ones. When apologetically engaged with a heretic or cult member they are usually more than thrilled to proof-text ad nauseum. This can quickly become counterproductive. If this is done in a public forum it can be disastrous. The onlookers could be convinced of the heretical doctrines.
Our apologetics should be from a capable well rounded understanding of the entire Bible in its own context. It should be founded on the presupposition that the Bible is the truth, and the authority, on What God has to say to man. When we start with a true presupposition, and are exegetical in our reading of the Bible, we can proof-text like Paul to the Jews in Hebrews. When proof-texting is done correctly it can win people’s minds to the truths of the Bible. There is nothing like a good section of scripture quoted in context at the right time to hammer home sound doctrine. God’s word is authoritative and when we speak truthfully with the authority of scripture it is a powerful thing to witness.
Snyder's Soapbox 
[This is the owner of the Snyder’s Soapbox site. I’m putting my comments inline with the text from the Judith]
I am a longtime SDA. As an SDA, we use the same bible all or most Christians use, the KJV.
[First, the most popular version by sales in 2024 was the ESV. The KJV is fine, but it isn’t the be all, end all, version.]
We DO NOT believe that Jesus was the ‘literal’ son of God as do the JW or Muslims. We also believe that God used the founders of the SDA movement, among them a special individual called Ellen G. White. Through extensive bible study, trial and error, and prophetic visions, God shed great light to His Word for the inception of this new movement coming out of (Baptists, Methodists and other protestant reformers), thereby, bringing clarity and understanding to the word of God.
[Judith misunderstands my statement, and thinks that I am saying that the SDA’s believe the same thing about Jesus that the Mormons, and JW’s do. I did not say that. I was saying they are guilty of proof-texting, and twisting scripture, void of context, to make it support the insane ramblings of heretic, and false prophetess, E.G. White.]
It is also most important to note, that the SDA church has always elevated Scripture/the Bible above any other book or writing. All writings which the SDA church has and continues to support are done through the lens and confirmation of the BIBLE. Whether we use Exegesis, Hermeneutics, Apologetics, Semantics or proof texting methods, it is all bible-based in order to arrive at accurate biblical interpretations.
[Her assertion in this last paragraph is just laughable. The SDA religion is a works righteousness cult. E.G. White gave many false prophecies. She is not a Biblically, God qualified elder. Scripture is very specific on who is, and is not. She, by being a she, is not. The doctrine of investigatory judgment negates the gospel, and disqualifies SDA’s from calling themselves Christian. There may be a few real Christians in their cult, but the doctrines of the SDA’s are damnable.]
LikeLike