Uncategorized

Exhaustive List of U.S. Federal Laws Targeting Communism and Subversive Activities in Institutions

Below is a comprehensive compilation of U.S. federal laws historically and currently aimed at combating communism and subversive activities, particularly within institutions such as government, labor unions, education, and other positions of influence. This list draws from historical anti-communist legislation primarily from the First and Second Red Scares (1917–1920 and 1940s–1950s), as well as remnants still on the books. Many provisions have been limited, repealed, or declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court on First Amendment grounds (e.g., requiring specific intent for advocacy of overthrow rather than mere belief). Enforcement today is rare and typically requires evidence of criminal acts like espionage or incitement to violence, not ideological affiliation alone.

The list is organized chronologically and includes:

  • Full Name and Citation: Legal reference.
  • Key Provisions: Focus on those enabling prosecution, registration, removal from positions, or restrictions in institutions.
  • Application to Institutions: How it targets roles in government, unions, etc.
  • Current Status (as of September 2025): Enforceability, amendments, or court rulings.
LawCitationKey ProvisionsApplication to InstitutionsCurrent Status (as of September 2025)
Voorhis Act (Foreign Agents Registration Act Amendments)18 U.S.C. § 2386 (originally 54 Stat. 1138, 1940)Requires organizations advocating overthrow of the U.S. government by force or violence (including communist groups) to register with the Attorney General and disclose foreign ties; failure is punishable by up to 5 years imprisonment and $10,000 fine.Targets subversive groups infiltrating unions, political organizations, or educational institutions; used to monitor communist fronts.Still in effect as part of FARA; enforced for foreign agents but rarely for domestic communism without foreign links. Upheld in cases like U.S. v. Dennis (1951).
Alien Registration Act (Smith Act)18 U.S.C. § 2385Criminalizes teaching, printing, or advocating overthrow of the U.S. government by force/violence; prohibits membership in groups plotting such overthrow; penalties up to 20 years imprisonment and $20,000 fine.Used to prosecute Communist Party leaders and remove them from federal employment or union roles via loyalty oaths.Active but narrowed by Yates v. U.S. (1957) (requires incitement to imminent lawless action) and Scales v. U.S. (1961) (active membership with intent only); last major use in 1950s, but applicable to modern sedition cases.
Taft-Hartley Act (Labor Management Relations Act), Section 9(h)29 U.S.C. § 159(h) (originally 61 Stat. 136, 1947; repealed 1959)Required union officers to sign affidavits disavowing communist affiliation; non-compliant unions lost NLRB protections.Barred communists from union leadership, affecting labor institutions.Repealed by Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (1959); historical only. Upheld initially in American Communications Ass’n v. Douds (1950).
Executive Order 9835 (Employee Loyalty Program)5 C.F.R. § 731.101 et seq. (1947; revoked 1953)Established loyalty review boards to investigate federal employees for “totalitarian, fascist, communist, or subversive” affiliations; grounds for dismissal included membership in listed subversive groups.Led to purges of ~5,000 federal workers suspected of subversion in government institutions.Revoked by Executive Order 10450 (1953); influenced modern security clearance processes but no longer directly enforceable.
McCarran Internal Security Act (Subversive Activities Control Act of 1950)50 U.S.C. §§ 781–798 (originally 64 Stat. 987, 1950)Requires registration of “Communist-action” (foreign-controlled) and “Communist-front” organizations; bars members from federal jobs, passports, and citizenship; authorizes emergency detention of subversives; prohibits sharing classified info with communists.Targets infiltration in government, defense, and unions; created Subversive Activities Control Board to investigate and remove from sensitive positions.Partially repealed (e.g., detention in 1971 Non-Detention Act; Board abolished 1972); registration invalidated in Albertson v. SACB (1965) on self-incrimination; passport ban struck in Aptheker v. Sec’y of State (1964); employment ban in U.S. v. Robel (1967). Remnants (e.g., §797 on military regulations) still used.
Immigration and Nationality Act (McCarran-Walter Act)8 U.S.C. §§ 1182(a)(3)(D), 1227(a)(4)(B) (1952)Makes communist affiliation grounds for inadmissibility/deportation; bars naturalization for current/former party members unless they prove non-advocacy of force.Prevents subversives from entering or holding influential roles in U.S. institutions; used for deportation from academia/government.Active; Section 241(a)(6)(C) invoked in 2025 case against Mahmoud Khalil for alleged communist ties. Upheld in Galvan v. Press (1954) but challenged on due process.
Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (Landrum-Griffin Act), Section 50429 U.S.C. § 504 (1959)Prohibits convicted communists or those advocating overthrow from holding union office for 5 years post-conviction; penalties up to 10 years imprisonment and $10,000 fine.Removes subversives from labor union leadership positions.Active but limited by Brown v. U.S. (1965) requiring specific intent; rarely enforced today.
Communist Control Act of 195450 U.S.C. §§ 841–844 (68 Stat. 775, 1954)Outlaws the Communist Party as a conspiracy to overthrow government; criminalizes membership/support (up to 5 years/$10,000); strips party of legal rights (e.g., no ballot access, suits); defines “communist-infiltrated organizations” for removal of leaders.Bars communists from unions, government, and elections; targets institutional influence.Still on books, never repealed; unused since 1950s due to constitutionality issues (e.g., bills of attainder); ruled unconstitutional in Blawis v. Bolin (1973) for ballot bans; dormant but cited in 2025 discussions on anti-communism.
Executive Order 10450 (Security Requirements for Government Employment)5 C.F.R. Part 731 (1953; amended)Mandates loyalty checks for federal employees; denies clearances for subversive associations, including communism; allows removal for “criminal, infamous, dishonest, immoral, or notoriously disgraceful conduct.”Applies to all federal institutions; basis for modern background checks revoking access for subversives.Active and amended (e.g., by EO 12968 in 1995); focuses on conduct over ideology; used in security clearances.
18 U.S.C. Chapter 115 (Treason, Sedition, and Subversive Activities)18 U.S.C. §§ 2381–2391 (various, consolidated 1948)Covers treason (§2381, death/imprisonment), seditious conspiracy (§2384, up to 20 years), advocating overthrow (§2385, Smith Act), and rebellion (§2383); broad anti-subversion framework.Prosecutes subversives in any institution plotting against government.Fully active; used in modern cases (e.g., January 6, 2021 prosecutions under §2384); no major changes in 2025.
communism

How to take our country back legally.

This is how we do it folks. We must tie the democrats, perverts, and globalists to these laws, and prosecute them.

Below is a historical list of major U.S. federal laws and legislative actions enacted over the past century that were designed to counter the threat of communism. These measures formed a comprehensive legal framework aimed at preventing the spread of communist ideology, curbing subversive activities, and protecting national security during the 20th century, particularly during the Cold War era.

This list is presented as a historical plan of action reflecting how the U.S. government legally responded to the challenge of communism. It is not an endorsement of these policies, but rather a factual summary of legislative efforts grounded in the national security concerns of their time.

A Legal Plan of Action to Counter the Spread of Communism in the United States (1920s–1950s)
1. Immigration Act of 1918 (Amended 1919, 1920s)
Purpose: Enabled the deportation of non-citizens advocating radical ideologies, including anarchism and Bolshevism.
Action: Targeted foreign-born radicals deemed a threat to public order; used against members of the Communist Party and labor activists.
Legal Tool: Provided executive authority to remove individuals promoting revolutionary doctrines.
2. Smith Act of 1940 (Alien Registration Act)
Purpose: Criminalized advocating the violent overthrow of the U.S. government.
Action: Made it illegal to:
Conspire to teach or advocate the violent destruction of the government.
Be a member of any organization promoting such overthrow.
Impact: Used to prosecute leaders of the Communist Party USA in the 1940s and 1950s (e.g., Dennis v. United States, 1951).
3. Executive Order 9835 (1947) – Federal Employee Loyalty Program
Purpose: Root out communist influence in the federal government.
Action: Established loyalty review boards to investigate federal employees.
Impact: Over 3 million background checks; hundreds dismissed or resigned over alleged communist ties.
Legal Basis: Administrative enforcement of anti-communist standards within the executive branch.
4. Internal Security Act of 1950 (McCarran Act)
Purpose: Strengthen domestic security against subversive activities.
Action:
Required Communist organizations to register with the Attorney General.
Created the Subversive Activities Control Board (SACB) to investigate suspected communist groups.
Authorized detention of suspected subversives during national emergencies.
Presidential Veto: Vetoed by Truman as “dangerous to freedom,” but overridden by Congress.
5. Communist Control Act of 1954
Purpose: Neutralize the Communist Party as a legal political entity.
Action:
Declared the Communist Party an “unlawful association.”
Prohibited CPUSA members from holding union office or obtaining passports.
Revoked the party’s right to collective bargaining representation.
Legal Effect: Effectively criminalized organized communist political activity.
6. Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter Act)
Purpose: Restrict entry of individuals based on political ideology.
Action:
Barred admission of anyone affiliated with communism or anarchism.
Allowed deportation of immigrants found to be communist sympathizers.
Impact: Institutionalized ideological screening in immigration policy.
7. Legislative Framework Supporting the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC)
Established: 1938 (formalized in subsequent years)
Purpose: Investigate disloyalty and subversive organizations.
Action:
Conducted high-profile investigations into Hollywood, labor unions, and government agencies.
Used subpoena power to compel testimony; blacklisted individuals who refused to cooperate.
Legal Authority: Derived from congressional investigative powers.
8. Eisenhower’s Executive Order 10450 (1953)
Purpose: Expand loyalty standards beyond mere membership.
Action: Broadened criteria to include “sexual perversion” and other “security risks,” but primarily used to dismiss federal workers suspected of communist sympathies.
Impact: Reinforced the Lavender Scare alongside anti-communist purges.
Summary of the Legal Strategy
This plan of action reflects a multi-pronged legal and administrative approach to combat communism in the United States:

1. Prevent Entry: Exclude communists through immigration law.
2. Monitor & Investigate: Use congressional and executive agencies to identify suspected subversives.
3. Prosecute Ideology: Criminalize advocacy of revolution and compel registration of communist groups.
4. Purge Institutions: Remove suspected communists from

cultural · election · gay marriage · gender dysphoria · God · gospel · government · hate · heresy · homosexual marriage · Liberal Christian · love · marriage · politics · Repentance · Sovereign choice · Stress · submission · Theology · transgender · transsexual · Uncategorized · under God

Snowed in, with a bad back, and an inauguration to watch.

If-we-ever-forget-that-we-are-one-nation
The last few days have been interesting. So much snow, that my gas furnace and on demand water heater both had their roof-top exhausts covered completely with snow. I didn’t want frozen pipes or a frozen house, so I had to get the exhausts cleared and call some professionals to get the over 3 ft. of accumulated snow off my roof. Thanks Arturo Martinez for all your hard work. If anyone needs some snow removed from their roof, message me and I’ll send you his number. The next morning of fun was realizing the pets could not go outside to do their business. I began to dig them a patch of ground out and wrenched my back. It gave me time to ponder deep topics like, “Will it get better or worse? Will I be able to get to work Monday? How many ibuprofen have I already taken?” One thing is for sure, is that the will of God will be done. This brings me to the inauguration. 4 and 8 years ago, I trusted in the will of God when the pro-abortion, (a.k.a. baby killing) perversion promoting, (LGBT nonsense) Barry Soetoro a.k.a. (Barack Obama) took office and kept it. Even while I wondered how people could condone the evils of perversion, (LGBT) perverse marriage, (Gay Marriage… no such thing) abortion, and socialist totalitarianism, I was comforted by the knowledge that God is sovereign and in control of all things, including the political leadership of this country. I honestly believe we were getting the leaders we deserved as an unrepentant people. We have been calling good evil and evil good for far too long to keep on experiencing the blessings of God. Instead, for 8 long years or corrosive evil leadership, we were under the discipline of God. I hope that the people have repented, and we will be experiencing a reprieve. God willing, may America be blessed once more. I would ask all of you to repent of your sin, put your faith in the finished work of Christ, and seek God’s glory and will first and foremost in the years to come.

cultural · politics · Uncategorized

Scared, Stay Safe? What in the World are they Scared of?

I’m sure many of you have seen the Facebook posts from your liberal friends and family.  You know the ones I’m talking about.  The ones that say, “Scared” or “Stay safe.”  What is it they are supposedly afraid of?  Do they actually think that conservatives are going to boldly go out and hunt them down?  Do they think that we are going to pass laws to take away the rights they share with us?  Nope, they aren’t afraid of anything.

It is insulting, passive aggressive, victim stance propaganda.  We need to handle it the same way we need to handle the other idiotic accusations these lost people make.  Think about how they operate.  They are intolerant.  They accuse us of being intolerant.  They are violent.  They accuse us of being violent.  They are racists they accuse us of being racist.  Do you see the pattern?  So when they say, “Scared” or, “Stay Safe” what they are really saying is that we are the ones who should be scared, and take measures to ensure our safety.

With that being said, pack your sidearms if you’ve got them.  You never know when you’ll run into a roadblock full of nice pacifists protestors who are going to yank you out of your car and beat you to death for just being white, or having a Christian bumper sticker.  Heaven forbid you were one of the millions of people who voted for Trump.  Then they will hunt you down, follow you back to your house, or your work, so they can break your windows and  loot your business.  They are so loving and tolerant…  if you are one of them.  If you are not, look out.

Just remember, the Bible says it will be your loved ones turning you over to the government to be martyred.  These lunatics actually think they are doing good.  Trump isn’t the person I would have lead our country, but I voted for him, because he was not as pro-abortion as Hillary.  So if that makes me a person they are afraid of, so be it.  Abortion is not a right, no matter what the supreme court says.  They invented that right in 1973 with Roe vs. Wade.  Our real rights are God given.  They aren’t created by courts.  I don’t expect any of these slaves of satan to understand that though.

For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, because that which is known about God is evident within them; for God made it evident to them. For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse. For even though they knew God, they did not honor Him as God or give thanks, but they became futile in their speculations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing to be wise, they became fools, and exchanged the glory of the incorruptible God for an image in the form of corruptible man and of birds and four-footed animals and crawling creatures. Therefore God gave them over in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, so that their bodies would be dishonored among them. For they exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen. For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural, and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty of their error. And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God any longer, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things which are not proper, being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, greed, evil; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malice; they are gossips, slanderers, haters of God, insolent, arrogant, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, without understanding, untrustworthy, unloving, unmerciful; and although they know the ordinance of God, that those who practice such things are worthy of death, they not only do the same, but also give hearty approval to those who practice them.
(Romans 1:18-32 NASB)

cultural · politics · Uncategorized

Trump Won’t Make America Great Again! We Need Repentance and God.


Trump won’t make our country great again. Tocqueville had it right when he said, “In the United States, the sovereign authority is religious…there is no country in the world where the Christian religion retains a greater influence over the souls of men than in America, and there can be no greater proof of its utility and of its conformity to human nature than that its influence is powerfully felt over the most enlightened and free nation of the earth.

In the United States, the influence of religion is not confined to the manners, but it extends to the intelligence of the people…

Christianity, therefore, reigns without obstacle, by universal consent…

I sought for the key to the greatness and genius of America in her harbors…; in her fertile fields and boundless forests; in her rich mines and vast world commerce; in her public school system and institutions of learning. I sought for it in her democratic Congress and in her matchless Constitution.

Not until I went into the churches of America and heard her pulpits flame with righteousness did I understand the secret of her genius and power.

America is great because America is good, and if America ever ceases to be good, America will cease to be great.

The safeguard of morality is religion, and morality is the best security of law as well as the surest pledge of freedom.

The Americans combine the notions of Christianity and of liberty so intimately in their minds, that it is impossible to make them conceive the one without the other

Christianity is the companion of liberty in all its conflicts — the cradle of its infancy, and the divine source of its claims.”

It is pretty clear what made us great was God.  Now we are a wicked nation in rebellion to God.  Then, we were a Christian nation devoted to God.  Preachers stopped preaching, the salt lost its saltiness, and the light faded away.  The cancer grew unimpeded and hidden from sight.  Now we are terminal.  It will take a miracle from God, not a politician or more government.